Skip to main content

Featured

Adoration terms also enter politics

If Dear Husband  surfaces as a film title, Dear Wife is the latest political doctrine in today's more or less complex, persisting situation.  If one aims purely at business doctrine, the other becomes a political idea for securing people's instant support in elections.  In his recently held crowded rally in Kanpur, AIMIM chief Asaduddin Owaisi did not fail to inkly advise the wedded youths not to miss saying "I love you" to their respective wives at all costs.  This was meant to pull their full attention towards his leadership.  He understood that, as long as young voters did not associate with the party, the message of bringing the party at heights would not be effectively & politically accomplished at this required time.  His advice was to say I love you to his wife thrice in one day by looking into their eyes straight. This suggestion was marked. Humbly uttering"I love you" to their wives stands as a rather deliberate, flowery tool to stress what h...

Where has rational temper gone?


 


What a distinctive manner of reflection! The capacity of a skilled physician to precisely identify the source of an illness has been considerably challenged by taking the patient to a female quack.

Despite this obvious actuality, one woman in particular came under the quack's grip. We were shocked to learn that when a boy was receiving regular treatment for a certain ailment from a licensed physician, the very foolish mother took him to a lady quack for his complete cure as well as solace. 

How nonsensical does it seem? Does it not appear completely opposite? Who approaches the quzcks for getting rid of sickness? A quack was preferred despite better treatment. How idiotic does it appear at the moment? 

The stupid woman, under the direct influence of her heartless relatives, chose that it was appropriate to have a quack provide the remedy without any other problems. It is not at all like a typical course. 

It can be challenging for any reasonable individual to search for a solution in the out-of-date standard of quackery in a society when scientific methods of therapy are the norm. This explains why rushing the quacks is still so awful and non-refreshing.

It was not at all pleasant to witness such an illogical and foolish action, which is, by far, inexpressibly repugnant, gaining the worst possible publicity. It's a more interpretive allusion to the era that seems consistent with a blatant disdain for our contemporary medical research.

It is neither a sensible nor a very cheerful approach to curing the ill person. It is not realistic, even at the same time.  Depending on who you are, you tend to be drawn to certain idiotic persons who stand ready to accept this sort of likeness. 

Whichever side of the quackery you fall on, how can one find validation or solace for these irrational beliefs in a good manner? Where has our bit of scientific temper gone at the moment?

If the young patient was consulted by a qualified doctor for examining the disease, what drove the mother to go to a woman quack for his immediate cure? Despite carrying proper treatment, the help of an illiterate quack was urgently sought.

Comments

Popular Posts