Muting mic controversy

The debate has started on closing down the microphone. Some openly say the opposite of what the ruling party leaders are claiming instantly. Unclear whether Bengal CM was allotted seven or five minutes! 

None seemed to have accepted this pertinent complexity. It’s a sorry state of affairs when the microphone becomes debatable news, but here we are vulnerable. The microphone matter acquires to grow rather in an odd course. 

We have also come across protests over the loudspeakers' noise earlier. Its decibel was lowered to an acceptable level. Afterwards, various complaints over switching off the mic in Parliament were raised and debated amply. It remains still a problematic subject. Rahul Gandhi was depressed and annoyed with this continuous phenomenon. 

The contention on the mic is not ending fully. It arises from time to time but the precise reason remains in incognizance. Why does it go on as a very crafty issue?

Is it emerging owing to a technical error or some other flaw? Is there any other reason behind it? There is a strong need to find out the actual faults hampering its fault-free output time and again? 

The microphone was muffled when West Bengal's Chief minister recently addressed the NITI Ayog meeting. 

It is definitely a sorry state of affairs when our politicians in meetings unwind news due to muting their voices through the microphone suddenly. 

As the lone non-BJP chief minister in Delhi, she went to take part in the 9th NITI Aayog Governing Council Meeting. Her adverse experience with the mic remains too annoying to describe now.  

It follows that the microphone obviously stops functioning outside of the parliament as well. She said that she could only talk for as many as five short minutes since her microphone was suddenly muted. 

Others, it has been alleged, were allowed to speak for about ten to twenty minutes before her, she insisted. 

"Even though I was the only Opposition party participant, I was not offered the ample opportunity to speak. This is improper," she continued to say before the Press. 

Mamata Banerjee had stated that she wished to bring up this political discrimination. West Bengal was subjected to a discussion of the Union Budget, even though Chief Ministers from the INDIA group boycotted the recent conference.  However, she too followed a similar alternative.

However, the Centre categorically denied Ms Banerjee's deep assertions and asserted with all the positive hints that her microphone was not muted absolutely.  Even the FM has come to explain everything pointwise. 

It has been said that the Meeting proved to be a distressing experience for her. Her mic was turned off. This pointed assertion is false. 

All that the clock indicated was the end of her speaking time. Even the PIB stated that "not even the bell was rung to mark it."

In the meantime, Bengal CM Banerjee was charged by Sitharaman with disseminating lies. She spoke nonstop. The time remained on the television in front of our tables.

She added that a few other CMs talked longer than they were supposed to. Extra time was granted at their request without any complaints. 

She made it clear that mics were not turned off for anyone in particular, CM, or WB. Mamata Banerjee has opted to disseminate misinformation.

West Bengal Congress head Adhir Ranjan Chowdhury called Mamata Banerjee's claim that her microphone was switched off during the NITI Aayog meeting a lie, departing from his party's official position.

It seems to me that Mamata Banerjee is lying about what she said at the NITI Aayog conference. 

If the chief minister of a state is denied the right to speak, that is really shocking. 

Mamata Banerjee anticipated what would take place there. The writing was with her, Adhir Ranjan remarked. The treatment of Banerjee was deemed reprehensible by Congress.

It will be apt to mention here that the microphone was introduced in 1877 and the loudspeaker was ready in year 1925.